LESSONS FROM THE LIFE AND MINISTRY OF ATHANASIUS
excerpts from a biographical sketch by John Piper,
"Contending for Our All" http://www.desiringgod.org/ResourceLibrary/Biographies/
1. Defending and
explaining doctrine is for the sake of the gospel of Christ’s glory and our
everlasting joy.
When Athanasius was driven into his third exile, he wrote an
open letter called “To the Bishops of Egypt.” In it he referred to the martyrs
for who had died defending the deity of Christ. Then he said, “Wherefore… considering that this
struggle is for our all…let
us also make it our earnest care and aim to guard what we have received.”
“The Arian controversy was a religious crisis involving the reality of revelation
and redemption.”
What was at stake was
everything. The incarnation has to do with the gospel…salvation…whether there
is any hope or life. The creed that Athanasius helped
craft [Creed of Nicaea],
and that he embraced and spent his life defending and explaining, says this
plainly…We believe…in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, begotten of the
Father…very God of very God…being of one substance with the Father…who for us men, and for our salvation, came down and
was incarnate and was made man; he suffered, and the third day he
rose again.
Athanasius saw the great proportion of things.
There are doctrines in the Bible that are worth dying for and living
for. They are the ground of our life. They are the heart of our worship. The
divine and human nature of Christ in one person is one of those doctrines.
2.
Joyful courage is the calling of a faithful shepherd.
Athanasius stared down murderous intruders into his church. He stood
before emperors who could have killed him as easily as exiled him. He risked
the wrath of parents and other clergy by consciously training young people to
give their all for Christ, including martyrdom.
Athanasius contra mundum should inspire every pastor to stand
your ground meekly and humbly and courageously whenever a biblical truth
is at stake. But be sure that you always out-rejoice your adversaries. If
something is worth fighting for, it is worth rejoicing over. And the joy is
essential in the battle, for nothing is worth fighting for that will not
increase our joy in God.
3.
Loving Christ includes loving true propositions about Christ
Propositions
about Christ carried convictions that could send you to heaven or to hell.
There were propositions like: “There was a time when the Son of God was not,”
and, “He was not before he was made,” and, “the Son of God is created.” These
propositions were strictly damnable…Therefore Athanasius
labored with all his might to formulate propositions that would conform to
reality and lead the soul to faith and worship and heaven.
…“It is
Christ who unites us; it is doctrines that divides.”
“We should ask, Whom do you trust, rather than what do
you believe?”…This is the very tactic used by the Arian bishops to cover the
councils with fog so that the word “Christ” could mean anything. Those who talk
like this—“Christ unites, doctrine divides”—have simply replaced propositions
with a word. They think they have done something profound and fresh, when in
fact they have done something very old and stale and very deadly.
4.
The truth of biblical language must be vigorously protected with non-biblical
language.
Athanasius’ experience was critically illuminating to
something I have come to see over the years, especially in liberally minded baptistic and pietistic traditions, namely, that the
slogan, “the Bible is our only creed” is often used as a cloak to conceal
the fact that Bible language is used to affirm falsehood. This is what Athanasius encountered so insidiously at the Council of Nicaea.
The Alexandrians…confronted
the Arians with the traditional Scriptural phrases which appeared to leave no
doubt as to the eternal Godhead of the Son. But to their surprise they were met
with perfect acquiescence…
“Theologians
of the Christian Church were slowly driven to a realization that the deepest
questions which face Christianity cannot be answered in purely biblical
language, because the questions are
about the meaning of biblical language itself.” The Arians railed
against the unbiblical language being forced on them. They tried to seize the
biblical high ground and claim to be the truly biblical people—the pietists, the simple Bible-believers—because they wanted to
stay with biblical language only—and by it smuggle in their non-biblical
meanings.
Athanasius saw through this “post-modern,”
"post-conservative,” “post-propositional” strategy and saved for us not
just Bible words, but Bible truth. May God grant us the discernment of Athanasius for our day. Very
precious things are at stake.
5. A
widespread and long-held doctrinal difference among Christians does not mean
that the difference is insignificant or that we should not seek to persuade
toward the truth and seek agreement.
“Athanasius, people have disagreed on this issue for 300
years and there has never been an official position taken in the church to
establish one side as orthodox and the other as heresy? Half the
bishops in the world disagree with you…So stop fighting this battle and let
different views exist side by side.
He did not
regard the amount of time that has elapsed or the number of Christians who
disagreed to determine what doctrines are important
and which we should strive to teach and spread and make normative in the
church…So today we should not conclude that the absence of consensus in
the church means doctrinal stalemate.
6.
Don’t aim to preach only in categories of thought that can be readily
understood by this generation. Aim at creating biblical categories of thought
that are not present.
Don’t
embrace the indigenous
principle of Christianity [“I have become all things to all people, that
by all means I might save some” (1 Cor. 9:22)] at the expense of the pilgrim principle [“Do not be conformed to
this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind” (Rom.12:2)].
Some of the
most crucial and precious truths of the Scripture are counter-intuitive
to the fallen human mind. They don’t fit easily into our heads…But the Bible
will not let its message be fit into the categories we bring with our fallen,
finite minds. It presses us relentlessly to create new categories of thought
to contain the mysteries of the gospel.
With the
conversion of Constantine and the Edict of Milan (313) which gave legal status
to Christianity, “the inevitable influx of heathen into the Church, now that
the empire had become Christian, brought with it multitudes to whom Arianism was a more intelligible creed than that of Nicaea”…To grow a church the temptation is to give the people what they
already have categories to understand and enjoy. But once that church is grown,
it thinks so much like the world that the difference is not decisive. The
radical, biblical gospel is blunted and the glory of Christ is obscured.
Rather,
alongside the indigenous principle of accommodation and
contextualization…have a deep commitment to the pilgrim principle of
confrontation and transformation and brain-boggling, mind-altering, recategorization of the way people think about reality.
These two
principles...start and continue together. We must not assume that the first and
basic truths of Christianity fit into the fallen mind of unbelievers*…that these first truths can be contextualized in categories
of thought that are present in the minds of 21st century human beings, and
that only later, after they have become Christians, we can begin to alter the
way they think with more advanced truth…From the very beginning, we are
speaking to them God-centered, Christ-exalting truths that shatter fallen human
categories of thought. We must not shy away from this.
From the very beginning, in the most winsome way possible…These
kinds of mind-boggling, category-shattering truths demand our best thought and
our most creative labors…that…a place for them would be created in the minds of
those who hear. We must not preach only in the categories that are already
present in our listeners’ fallen minds, or we will betray the gospel
and conceal the glory of God.
----------------
* God rules the world of
bliss and suffering and sin…yet, though He wills that such sin and suffering
be, He…is perfectly holy; God governs all the steps of all people…yet such that
all are accountable before Him and will bear the just consequences of His wrath
if they do not believe in Christ; All are dead in their trespasses and sin and
are not morally able to come to Christ because of their rebellion, yet, they
are responsible to come and will be justly punished if they don’t; Jesus Christ
is one person with two natures, divine and human…; sin, though committed by a
finite person and in the confines of finite time is nevertheless deserving of
an infinitely long punishment because it is a sin against an infinitely worthy
God; the death of the one God-Man, Jesus Christ…that God is not unrighteous to
declare righteous ungodly people who simply believe in Christ.
7. Don't assume that old books, which say some startling
things, are necessarily wrong, but may in fact have something glorious to teach
that we never dreamed.
…What is
the ultimate end of creation—the ultimate goal of God in creation and
redemption? Is it being [our being like Christ] or seeing [our seeing the glory of Christ]? How does Rom.8:29 (“predestined to be conformed
to the image of his Son”) relate to Jn.17:24
(“Father, I desire that they also, whom you have given me, may be with me where
I am, to see my glory”)? Is the beatific vision of the glory of the Son of God
the aim of human creation? Or is likeness to that glory the aim of creation?
Athanasius has helped me go deeper here by unsettling
me. I am inclined to stress seeing as the goal rather than being…it seems
to me that putting the stress on seeing the glory of Christ makes him the
focus, but putting the stress on being like Christ makes me the focus…His
language of deification forces me to think more deeply and worship more
profoundly.
My present
understanding…the ultimate end of creation is neither being nor seeing, but delighting and displaying. Delighting in and displaying
“the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ” (2 Cor.4:6). And the displaying happens both in the delighting, since we glorify most what we
enjoy most, and in the deeds of
the resurrection body that flow from this enjoyment on the new earth in the age
to come. The display of God’s glory will be both internal and external. It will
be spiritual and physical. We will display the glory of God by the
Christ-exalting joy of our heart, and by the Christ-exalting deeds of our
resurrection bodies.